A Portrayal of Suffering to a White Audience
The prompt I chose for this blog post was to compare and contrast an element of Black autobiography between Jacobs' Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl and Washington's Up from Slavery. The specific element I decided I wanted to focus on was their respective portrayals of their suffering during slavery, and how they interact with that topic to their audience. To start with, while they endured similar struggles while enslaved, the extent of the details are different between the two autobiographies. Even the way Jacobs and Washington were freed from slavery differ.
While she doesn’t disclose every single thing about all that she went through, Jacobs sheds a lot of light on the suffering she experienced while enslaved. While she was born under the control of a master who was at least kinder to her than most, that small sense of security she was able to feel was stripped away from her as soon as her new masters, Dr and Mrs Flint, took over. Jacobs described the extent of the mistreatment that she endured when the Flints first became her masters, ranging from physical to sexual assault. At the start of her narrative Jacobs tells the reader something of a disclaimer, that the events written in her autobiography were in fact true, and that she had not in the slightest exaggerated the wrongs that she had been dealt during her time enslaved.
Jacobs also tells her readers about the hardships she endured to escape from slavery to her freedom. First, to escape the Flint household, she stowed away in a cramped space in her grandmother’s house for years with only a few holes in the ground as a source of light. From there she was able to escape north with the help of a friend and find shelter in Boston. However, when the Fugitive Slave Law was passed her life was put into danger again, and she had to be on the run once more. Jacobs’s time of being a fugitive came to an end when a friend of hers paid for her freedom. That is where Jacobs ends her narrative: with the announcement of her freedom, and a plea for her white readers to consider what she’s said. Throughout her work Jacobs speaks to her readers-most of whom are likely white- about her suffering as a way to shed a light on and bring attention to the horrors of slavery.
Booker T. Washington, on the other hand, presents his experiences with slavery differently in a more straightforward way. From the beginning he mentions in his preface that with his work he intended to tell a simple story without embellishments. In Up from Slavery Washington states the facts of his enslavement plainly, one of which being the fact that because of the disregard to black family records he does not have the exact date of what day he was born. While Washington does talk about the suffering he endured as a slave, such as the bad living conditions of the home that he was born into, at no point does he try to appeal to his readers.
The way both of these writers interact with the topic of their suffering is also likely based on their circumstances of how and why they were writing it. In the prelude of Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Jacobs mentions the desire to find sympathy in her readers, specifically the white women of the North, in order to draw attention to the conditions of the several black people who were still enslaved. Washington, on the other hand, says that Up from Slavery is an outgrowth of a collection of several articles about incidents in his life that were requested to be told. This contrast of the two writer’s intentions for their books shows itself in their writing.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYou make a clear point about how these two stories depict slavery differently and this relates to the central aim of the works. I think it's really important that we read both of these texts in class to allow us an understanding of similarities and differences between slave experiences. It's also important to think about who these texts were made for and what the authors set out to accomplish by sharing their narratives. Great post!
ReplyDeleteI agree with your analysis that the different reasons behind why the two authors wrote their respective autobiographies played an important role in the way they present their suffering as slaves. The difference in their titles alone kind of shows that; Washington is writing about moving *up* from slavery, rather than depicting enslaved life, whereas Jacobs is quite literally depicting the suffering she experienced as a slave girl. I also think that their widely different experiences played a part; while both Washington and Jacobs were exposed to and had to deal with many struggles in slavery, the duration of time they spent enslaved as well as the different sacrifices and abuses they faced definitely played a role in how they depict the institution of slavery. Great post!
ReplyDeleteI agree. I think that the goal of both of these writers was to invoke different emotions in readers, one heart-wrenching, the other analytical. I would also like to note that because they had different such perspectives on their respective situations, their writing voices in their storytelling are so distinct. Maybe we could also think about what kind of people they were as well, based on what we know, and see how that plays a role.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting to look at the respective reasons why each of them created their autobiographies and put them into the context of their story-building. When I was reading them, I definitely felt more sympathetic to Jacobs than Washington, and could tell that they each had different goals when publishing them. It is very interesting to see how both of their situations impacted them in varying ways-Jacobs suffered through slavery for so long while Washington was just a child. I ponder how they might recount their time as slaves differently if they experienced it at different times and had different goals for their autobiographies.
ReplyDeleteYour analysis of how Jacobs and Washington approach their suffering during slavery sheds light on their differing intentions. I think Jacobs' detailed portrayal of her hardships evokes sympathy from her readers, especially white women in the North, so that she raises awareness about the horrors of slavery. Meanwhile, Washington focuses on factual storytelling without appealing as much to his audience. It's intriguing to see how their distinct circumstances shape how they write.
ReplyDeleteGabby, great post! Your comparison between Jacob and Washington's autobiographies is complex and looks not only at the text for analysis, but the circumstances of their surroundings. Additionally, your mention of intent is also a key player. While Harriet was geared more towards persuading white women to join the cause of abolition, Washington wrote more towards the white and black community holistically, as a way to both provide inspiration for black people to "put down their bucket where you are" and to appeal to white people.
ReplyDelete